Mecanismos de acción de agentes propuestos para el tratamiento farmacológico específico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Mechanisms of action of proposed agents for the specific pharmacological treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Resumen Desde la notificación de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2, agente patógeno responsable del COVID-19, muchos de los tratamientos dirigidos a su manejo han estado sometidos a estudios de manera constante, con el fin de comprobar su eficacia y seguridad. El conocimiento de su virología y etiopatogenia posibilitaría objetivar los pasos moleculares específicos que puedan ser blancos terapéuticos de variados fármacos actualmente disponibles. Esta experiencia proviene principalmente de las infecciones por SARS-CoV y MERS-CoV, con resultados variados 'in vitro' en el SARS-CoV-2, sin evidencia clínica que demuestre efectividad y seguridad de dichos tratamientos. A la fecha, no se ha podido concretar con claridad un esquema de tratamiento específico, debido a que la evidencia surgida ha puesto en jaque cada uno de los fármacos propuestos. Esto ha motivado a continuar en la búsqueda de una estrategia efectiva que permita manejar esta pandemia con la seguridad y eficacia necesaria para que el beneficio terapéutico esté por sobre los posibles efectos adversos que estos esquemas farmacológicos pudiesen presentar. La siguiente revisión pretende mostrar la evidencia disponible a la fecha, definiendo la actividad de cada fármaco en función de su mecanismo de acción.

Since the beginning of the pandemic by SARS-CoV-2, the pathogen responsible for COVID-19, many of the therapeutic options for its management have been under constant revision, in order to verify their safety and efficiency. Knowledge of the viral structure and pathogenesis make it possible to determine the molecular pathways that may be targeted with current available drugs. The experience with these drugs comes mainly from infections caused by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, in vitro studies with SARS-CoV-2 that yield variable results, and clinical experience that does not ensure effectiveness and safety of such drugs. To date, it has not been possible to elucidate a specific treatment scheme, because of the constant release of evidence that challenges the usefulness of the proposed drugs. This has motived us to continue seeking for an effective strategy that allows to manage this pandemic in a safe and efficient manner, so that therapeutic benefit surpasses the related adverse drug reactions that can occur. The following review aims to showcase the evidence available to date by defining the activity of each drug based on its mechanism of action.

Esclerosis múltiple: reacciones adversas a medicamentos en pacientes bajo ley 20850, Hospital Regional de Talca / Multiple sclerosis: adverse drug reactions in patients under law 20850, Hospital Regional de Talca

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, which occurs in up to 85% of cases as relapsing remitting (RR), with episodes of neurological dysfunction partially forwarded. Its treatment in Chile is financially protected by the Explicit Health Guarantees (GES) and Law 20,850 on high-cost diseases. The Regional Hospital of Talca (HRT) has 25 patients benefiting from Law 20,850 in treatment with second-line biologic therapy. Adverse reactions (RAM) to the use of these drugs have been described and to date there are no case reports or studies of significant adverse events in Chile. Objectives: To present the experience of the use of biologic therapy in EMRR in HRT, in relation to adverse events. METHODS: A review of the current guidelines in Chile for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and the protocol of law 20,850 was carried out, the clinical records of 25 patients benefiting from the law in the HRT were reviewed, with emphasis on the adverse events presented before First and second line therapies and the con sequences of these events on the continuity of therapy. RESULTS: Half of the patients who started their treatment with first-line drugs had adverse effects, of which 28% involved a change in therapy, the remaining changed from therapy due to failure to treatment. Of the 26 patients included in the sample, 24 are currently using second-line drugs. The profile of adverse effects should be a variable to consider when indicating a therapy for MS.

Medication withdrawal may be an option for a select group of patients in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis / Retirada de medicacao pode ser uma opcao para um grupo selecionado de pacientes com esclerose multipla remitente-recorrente

This article describes the clinical and radiological evolution of a stable group of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis that had their disease-modifying therapy (DMT) withdrawn. Forty patients, which had made continuous use of one immunomodulator and had remained free of disease for at least 5 years, had their DMT withdrawn and were observed from 13 to 86 months. Out of the followed patients, 4 (10%) patients presented with new attacks. In addition to these patients, 2 (5%) patients had new lesions revealed by magnetic resonance imaging that did not correspond to clinical attacks. Despite these results, the difficult decision to withdraw medication requires careful analysis. Withdrawal, however, should not be viewed as simply the suspension of treatment because these patients should be evaluated periodically, and the immunomodulators should be readily reintroduced if new attacks occur. Nonetheless, medication withdrawal is an option for a select group of patients.

Esse artigo descreve a evolução clínica e radiológica de um grupo de pacientes com esclerose múltipla estável, forma recorrente-remitente, nos quais foi retirada a terapia modificadora da doença (DMT). Quarenta pacientes, que faziam uso contínuo de um imunomodulador e permaneceram livres da doença pelo menos por 5 anos, tiveram sua DMT retirada e foram observados de 13 a 86 meses. Dos pacientes seguidos, 4 (10%) apresentaram novos surtos. Além destes, 2 (5%) pacientes apresentavam novas lesões na ressonância magnética, sem sintomas clínicos. Apesar destes resultados, a retirada da medicação é uma decisão difícil, requer análise cuidadosa e não deve ser considerada como sinônimo de suspender o tratamento, já que estes pacientes devem ser avaliados periodicamente e o uso de imunomoduladores tem de ser prontamente reiniciado no caso do aparecimento de novos surtos. Não obstante, a retirada do medicamento é uma opção para um grupo selecionado de pacientes.

Interferon-beta in pediatric multiple sclerosis patients: safety in short-term prescription

None of the approved immunomodulatory drugs in adults Multiple Sclerosis [MS] patients have been officially approved for the pediatric patients and are currently used off-label in this population. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of intramuscular interferon beta1-a [Avonex[registered]] and subcutaneously injected interferon beta1-b [Betaferon[registered]] in children with definite relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS]. Thirteen patients aged younger than 16, who were recently diagnosed with definite RRMS according to the McDonald's criteria, were enrolled in this study. Six patients were treated with Avonex[registered] 30 micro g, intramuscularly every week, and seven patients were treated with Betaferon[registered] 250 micro g, subcutaneously every other day. All patients were treated with adult doses; initially interferon-beta was prescribed with half dose, and it was increased to full adult dose steadily. Eleven girls and two boys, mean [SD] age of 14.7 [1.9] years, were studied. Following nine months of using interferon-beta, nine patients [69.2%] had no relapses and the remaining four, experienced only one relapse. The mean EDSS score was decreased significantly after the study period. The present study provides reasonable data for the use of interferon-beta in Pediatric MS due to lack of short-term complications and safety. Studies with larger sample size and longer follow up duration are required to shed light on the long term impact of the interferon-beta therapy in children

Tratamiento de la enfermedad de Peyronie con interferón beta natural / Treatment of la Peyronie's disease with natural interferon

Se trataron 10 pacientes con enfermedad de Peyronie mediante la aplicación intralesional de interferon beta natural humano (IFNbeta). La edad media de los pacientes fue de 49 años, con límites de 37 a 67 años, y el tiempo promedio de evolución de la enfermedad fue de 11.9 meses. Se efectuó una aplicación promedio de 36 millones de unidades internacionales (que equivale a 12 aplicaciones, ya que cada ampolleta contiene 3 millones de unidades internacionales). Se logró hacer desaparecer el dolor en 100 por ciento de los pacientes; en 80 por ciento la curvatura disminuyó y en 87 por ciento decreció la placa fibrosa. No se observaron efectos secundarios graves ni complicaciones mayores. El IFNbeta aplicado en forma intralesional es un medicamento sumamente eficaz para el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Peyronie.